Let’s play word association…
I say: Rachel Alexandra. You say: freak, amazing, elegant, Ruffian-esque, history in the making.
I say: Zenyatta. You say: perfect, grinder, weight don’t matter, Personal Ensign-esque, super freak.
Notice the answer to either filly is not the other’s name? Amazing how that happens. And why is that? Because each gets to stand on their own merits – and the greatness of one has nothing to do with the other.
And I want everyone to stop with the “they must face each other” banter. Give it up because (A) it’s 99.9% not going to happen, and (B) both have proven the best of their respective age groups this year.
Given each camp’s rhetoric, I see only one logical spot for them to meet (and no, it’s not at Santa Anita on November 7th). It’s the Donn Handicap at Gulfstream in February. Why is this ideal? Because it fills the (why is this necessary?) component of the two girls going against the boys, plus it would be a great spot for Rachel to start her 2010 campaign while allowing Zenyatta to ship east for one last race before heading off to the breeding shed in Kentucky.
Gulfstream has already announced they would wave the nomination/entry/starter fees for the Donn to both Rachel and Zenyatta – regardless if both run.
But something keeps striking me as a mix of ridiculous and just plain odd: Belmont has promised to raise the purse of the Beldame to $1 million if both fillies run, Breeders’ Cup has promised an additional $1 million to the Classic winner’s share if both fillies run (why not the Ladies Classic, I don’t know), and James McIngvale (aka Mattress Mac of Gallery Furniture and During/Bull Market fame) has pledged $2 million for the fillies to meet in a match race at Sam Houston.
Why, then, am I irked? Zenyatta is owned by Mr. & Mrs. Jerry Moss (a very successful executive from the recording/entertainment industry), while Rachel has been owned for four months by a partnership led by Stonestreet Stables’ Jess Jackson (who made an absolute fortune with Kendall-Jackson) … these are not people in need of purse money. And if tracks can come up with the money for a promotional event, why then are purses so low that race dates are being cut? (another issue for another blog, I know)
To boot, these are two of the best managed horses in history: Zenyatta is somewhat fragile and that’s meant just 12 starts for the 5yo mare; Rachel, meanwhile, has had maybe the toughest single year campaign we’ll ever see a modern day Thoroughbred have (consider that her 65-and-a-head win margin this year includes beating 3yo Fillies five times, 3yo Colts twice, AND older males).
There is a definite bias between East and West coasters when it comes to which filly is better. But the facts speak for themselves and each horse’s record makes it pretty obvious that Rachel will take 3yo Filly and Horse of the Year honors, while Zenyatta will be Older Filly/Mare for the second year in a row. If Zenyatta wins one more race and then takes the Breeders’ Cup Classic, then yes, maybe she makes a case for Horse of the Year (based on weight she’s carried and then beating the boys).
If you still need to make a fuss over them not meeting on the track this year, take solace that these two super-freaky fillies can still facing each other on the Horse of the Year ballots. But why can’t we all just let the ladies run into the history books – they don’t have any more to prove.