MJR

Going to the track goes back generations in my family and one ride on a pony named Coco at 18 months old had me hooked. Standing in the Del Mar paddock for my 15th birthday, I knew racing was the life for me. On a June 2002 Friday night at Hollywood Park, after winning $55 on a first time starter, I ran into a producer from TVG, which led to a production assistant gig. When I moved to Louisville for college, I was offered a job with the Churchill Downs clockers for the 2003 Fall Meet. My first morning, a trainer asked how his horse had done: she was (eventual Grade 1 winner) Stellar Jayne and he was (hall of famer) D. Wayne Lukas. Since then I’ve had some pretty cool gigs: Churchill’s Corporate Communications intern (2004), Tour Director for Three Chimneys Farm (2005), TVG’s Racing Information Coordinator (2006), Manager of Racing Operations for Puglisi Racing (2008-2009), etc… In my “spare time” I co-host Race and Sports Radio (weekends on wsRadio.com & 98.9fm ESPN San Diego) and Kentucky Winner’s Circle (Saturday’s on WKJK-1080am & KYWC.net). I also contribute to sites like the New York Times’ The Rail, and work major sporting events like the Cotton Bowl and PGA Championship.

Let me preface this piece by saying that I absolutely applaud anyone who goes out and puts their money where the wagers are: ponying up the cash to get involved in the most gut-wrenching, wallet-busting part of this game.

It’s easy to name the celebrities who find fame early and then have an identity crisis some years in. Britney Spears immediately comes to mind, as does her Mickey Mouse Club co-star Christina Aguilera (who waited until she was married with a kid to start acting like the teenager she never got to be). Only Taylor Swift appears to have escaped the spotlight with both her teenage years and sanity intact; though at 22, some would say the jury is still out.

Unless they’re a Kardashian, celebrities have been working on their craft most of their lives and the sudden adulation can be difficult to adjust to. And there can be no denying that we’re seeing this exact same behavior from Mike Repole, owner of Travers winner Stay Thirsty and Kings Bishop runner up (and reigning Juvenile Champion) Uncle Mo.

Mike is a rare breed of horse owner: he invested his billions in the claiming game for many years before ramping up and spending the money to step into graded company. Here is a man who singlehandedly keeps NYRA running over the winter months with his cheaper horses. And for whom that elusive G1 victory didn’t come until late last summer. Plus, he made some fantastic comments about the responsibility of an owner at last year’s Eclipse Awards.

But therein lies the problem. The horse he essentially dubbed the People’s Pony got sick. It was an illness that took time to diagnose and I believe they will look back to realize they handled that situation poorly. But they did the right thing by scratching the horse, sending him to one of the best private rehab facilities around, giving him time and then easing him back into working out.

They could (and, in my mind should) have found a softer spot for him to return to the races, but the horse performed admirably and was beat a whisker by an improving foe. Then, to cap a huge day for the Repole silks, the “little buddy” (who had – in my well documented opinion – no business being on the Derby Trail), comes back and crushes a solid field in the following G1 race.

That’s where it all fell apart. Repole began making statements that reminded me of Courtney Love throwing her makeup mirror to get Madonna’s attention on the MTV red carpet several years ago: a desperate attempt to keep one’s name in the news.

The idea that Uncle Mo finishing second in the Kings Bishop is “the lowest of the lows” in Repole’s racing career is, honestly, his Britney Spears head shaving moment. It’s as if he thought “what’s the single most outlandish thing I can get away with?” And then actually said it. Attention is good, but this kind of attention is not what you want. Barry Irwin made a statement on live television following the Derby that was out of line, but it was the only inappropriate thing he said in that timeframe and it was in response to a question that broke the “never ask what you don’t already know the answer to” rule.

We all say things out of turn and things can be misconstrued or taken out of context. But the point was made and I agree: finishing second in a major stake isn’t low – unless you’re from the Eight Belles camp and have to make a heart-wrenching decision moments after the biggest race of your lives.

Uncle Mo got beat. It sucks. But why not celebrate the fact that, off a four month layoff, your superstar ran his heart out despite being exhausted in the final strides? To call his health into question after the race by saying he may be retired because of “the illness” then further explaining that he doesn’t want the horse to go through that again… that leads any logical person to believe that the horse isn’t 100% healthy. Which should be disclosed before the race, not after (see the post-race disclosure of throat surgery to the $102 winner of the first race on the card for proof).

Mike Repole is the source of much amusement for the Twitterverse. But he’s truly a good guy and he’s great for this game on all levels. He’s just having a very public adjustment to the fame. I would suggest keeping him away from umbrellas, anything that can be used to shave one’s head, and Lindsay Lohan.

Racing doesn’t have a conservatorship program: the worst thing that can happen is for him to burn himself out by trying so hard to be the perfect owner. And, like celebrity or Congress, there is no such thing.

Mike: pull back, grab a Vitamin Water Revive (or two), take a few days with your family, get some perspective and let the horses speak for themselves. The game needs you to hold it together.

HearNoEvil

It doesn’t matter where you put the S and the L, the battle of Salix / Lasix will be raging for a while. And rage it should because we only have ourselves to blame.

We, as an industry, wanted the bigger, faster, better Thoroughbred – at any cost. Forget the argument about breeding for speed not soundness; our biggest problem is that we didn’t see bleeding as a sign of weakness: we saw it as a surmountable obstacle on the way to the next Kentucky Derby winner.

A horse’s will to win is only impeded by his physical limitations

Consider Midnight Lute: as talented a horse as Baffert ever trained and the only horse to win the Breeders’ Cup Sprint twice. He could not breathe right: 3 tie-back surgeries helped but, best-case, he had an airway getting 60% capacity.

Will he be anything like Two Punch as a sire? Don’t get me wrong, I love Two Punch progeny and many of his babies run very, very well. Many of his babies also fail a veterinarian’s scope because he passed on small airways. And a horse who can’t get enough air in tends not to run very far.

These aren’t quarter cracks, folks. Those are situational. Sure, a horse can be prone to them, but a quarter crack heals completely as long as you give the proper time off – see Big Brown.

Every stallion passes on positive and negative traits to their progeny and most flaws we as buyers can live with: it’s our job to find those specimens that have the best of mom and dad. But we, as an industry, should have known better when it comes to bleeders. We’ve allowed traits to be passed on for so many generations; yet, being prone to bleed is often overlooked for the distance or surface a horse should be able to run.

So man invented a salve: something that slows down the evolutionary process of thinning out the herd. In the wild, if an animal can’t keep up, it is – sadly – often left behind. That’s also true in every other professional sport. Don’t have the speed to make the 72 man roster in the NFL? You make the practice team. Can’t keep up there? You’re cut. It’s not nice, but it gets wins.

In racing, it’s become Win At Any Cost

There is a story out there right now about the harness trainer who’s been banned for being too good. He admits to using a drug from France that is widely used in the sulky community. Well, TP-500 has made its way to the Thoroughbred ranks. At $7,000 a pack, it’s quite an investment. Anything to get the win, though! And – like the steroid ban – I don’t believe for one minute that veterinarians won’t still be giving Lasix on backstretches across the country: as long as it’s not on race day, anything is possible.

One of the arguments against Lasix is the case of a horse who was beaten some 30+ lengths, was given the anti-bleeder medication, and came back to win by a comfortable margin. That’s a performance enhancing drug!

No: that’s a horse who probably couldn’t breathe because of blood filling his lungs and, when given something to stop the bleeding, he was able to run at maximum capacity. And, at maximum capacity, he wasn’t all together awful.

But why was he even on the track? If memory serves, the horse in question was a claimer – the backbone of the industry. If we don’t have cheap horses to fill races, we don’t have much of a game. But isn’t it up to us as owners and trainers (at all levels) to say, “this horse bleeds – he’s not meant to be a racehorse.” No, we shoot ‘em up and send ‘em out.

So, now, we’re left with the ultimate problem: we let this go for far too long and now we want to correct the mistake. At least we gave ourselves a year’s head start. Doing this was always going to be painful and I applaud the various committees’ efforts to put the ban into place because it takes guts. But why a sudden ban, not a gradual one? This cliff’s edge approach will undoubtedly lose us a generation of runners. A let-down approach over the next 7 – 10 years would have allowed it to be weaned out of the gene pool.

I can’t name one G1 winner in the last 5 years that didn’t run on Lasix, at least in North America. When Silver Charm shipped to Dubai and won the World Cup, he did it with nothing in his system. And he paid the price: he was never the same, probably because his lungs were already scarred and the problem was greatly exacerbated from being “allowed” to bleed again. Silver Charm’s been a useful stallion, but will never top the yearly rankings. What about every horse who does? Lord knows what they would have really been had they not had a little help.

We let this happen. And now the solution we’re about to put into place is going to make it ten times worse before it gets better. I never really understand the long-term planning by the federal government when they dole out $20 billion over the next 10 years – give us the funds, we could use them now.

In the case of racing’s ban on Lasix, though, I believe the only way to do it is long-term: we bred it into the Thoroughbred, we should be allowed to breed it out.

I was on a conference call about a racing-related project I’m doing with non-racing people. After mentioning that a horse I’d given to clients of my handicapping analysis of Saratoga had won and paid over $10, I got what is among my top favorite questions…

If you’re such a good handicapper, why do you even need a real job?

He said it in jest and I totally get the sentiment: regular people assume that folks in the game can make stacks of cash through the windows. And people are often stunned to find that I a) don’t bet every day, and b) consider myself a $2 bettor. Yes, I’m getting more and more brave when it comes to playing multi-leg exotics, but I’ve still never put in a ticket for more than $36 without having partners. To this day, my biggest score was a $146.50 exacta in the 2004 Mother Goose, when I played $2 on Stellar Jayne straight over Ashado. I also believe the fractional wagers ($.50 Pick 3s, 4s, and 5s and $.10 supers) are the greatest innovation in the game since the safety rail.

But answering the question of why don’t I make my living gambling isn’t just a case of frugality: I know too much. The fun for me is the validation that a morning work was as good as I thought or that I read the Form right. If I make money, all the better.

The conversation yesterday comes on the heels of reading an article on NorthJersey.com. The writer hadn’t been to the track in ages and took her family to Monmouth for family fun day. But the family apparently didn’t fully enjoy their experience because they didn’t come away driving a Brinks truck.

I spent the summer of 2007 working at Monmouth, so I can attest to the phenomenal job that particular track does to make it a day at the races for everyone. From the sand castle competitions, to the picnic area, to the layout of the facility – it’s impossible to not have fun there.

I believe that you have to get kids in on the fun of racing early – but why focus on the wagering side?

When asked how new fans should be introduced to the game, my answer is simple: get ‘em in the gates and stand ‘em on the rail at the 16th pole. They’ll be hooked because you cannot not feel the energy of the final strides of a race – it doesn’t matter if it’s a Blind Luck/Harve de Grace photo finish or a Smiling Tiger runaway victory.

Horseracing is about beautiful animals running in a pack at breakneck speed – it’s raw power, athleticism, and grace. Teaching kids financial responsibility – as the author of that piece did – by not betting more than you budgeted for is a fantastic idea. And the idea that they didn’t win massive amounts of cash is probably a good thing – it’s super easy to get seduced by first timer’s luck.

I worry that her kids will miss the point. Going to a football or baseball game is fun because you cheer for your favorite team and they either win or lose. Racing is the same – we just give you more chances.

But I have to ask … when did winning become fun only when monetized?

Pas De Deux

Horseracing is inherently rhythmic: it is hearts pulsing and hooves pounding, heads turning and hands moving, sweat dripping and legs tangling.

All this at 45 miles per hour in a tightly packed herd hurling themselves around hairpin turns – it puts the Quickstep to shame.

Like other well paid performers, racehorses each have their own style: there are those like Zenyatta who prefer to toil at the back and be all-but forgotten until the final eighth of a mile; or those like Secretariat who would pull jockey Ron Turcotte out of the irons to lead the field through its paces.

Competitive ballroom dancers are accomplished in many styles, yet typically shine in one specialty. The best racehorses are much the same.

Going into the last leg of the 2011 Triple Crown races, you’ll see these stars at the Belmont.

Shakleford is very much a Foxtrot star: his style is “quick – slow – slow – quick.” The chestnut son of Forestry has won 3-of-7 races lifetime, including the Preakness, and owns a second in the Florida Derby. His best finishes have been when he’s set or been just off a quick early pace, then slowed down for the middle fractions, and come home in a relatively quick 13-and-change.

Animal Kingdom, however, runs more in the style of the Paso Doble: a dance of passion and drama that is an interpretation of a bullfight. It is danced with sharp movements designed to create a sense of tension. The Kentucky Derby winner has never been worse than second in six starts, though anyone who’s ever had a wager on him can attest to the fact that he eeks out every last inch of the racetrack before finding the wire like a bull drawn to the red cape.

Watching “always a bridesmaid, only once a bride” Nehro is like watching someone dance the Mambo: consistent steps at the same intervals. Santiva owns a similar record of 7-1-3-1 and is consistently sluggish in his fractions, despite being rather elegant to watch – like two dancers in the continuously turning Waltz. Stay Thirsty has the Rumba rhythm down pat: “quick – quick – slow – slow.”

What does this mean for the Belmont Stakes on Saturday? If you’re like me and a fan of the true ballroom dance competitions, big races with full fields are much like the freestyle round where couples dance choreographed routines with many elements of their best dances.

In America, there is no race like the Belmont: combine the sweeping turns with the distance, and angles like post position bias and trainer statistics go out the window; as handicappers are forced to rely on pedigree and jockey ability. Plus remember the age-old adage that the best horse doesn’t always win and you might as well be dancing the frenzied Merengue come post time.

After two minutes and twenty seven seconds, one thing clearly separates dancing from racing. It’s no longer about fancy footwork. Winners often prevail by a nose. Other than Jennifer Grey – noses typically don’t take the prize on DWTS.

 

photo courtesy of the amazing Rick Samuels

kirk-phaser

Horses had just come off the track, so trainers were still in shock somewhat about what they’d just seen. Therefore, when asked about how their horse’s trip went, how they’d come out of it, or how they felt, they can be forgiven for not having their Trainer Speak phasers on stun.

Graham Motion didn’t lose, so he doesn’t count.

Only Nick Zito had a prepared an excuse: “he was dead last and they never came back”. Of the 19 losing horses’ 18 trainers (Maker had 2), Peter Miller and Kathleen O’Connell are the only ones not quoted. This means that they were not found immediately after the race, either by crowd or by choice.

Off the official “Kentucky Derby Losing Trainer Quotes” list, there are:

  • 5 No excuses/Ran good/Never stopped
  • 4 Not Our Day
  • 3 Proud/Pleased with my horse
  • 2 Fabulous/Delighted

If your first inclination – to a reporter, into a microphone – is that the race didn’t suck for your horse, you don’t get to retract that tomorrow. So, other than Jinx Fires, no one gets to rev up the Excuse Generator.

 

Derby

Six months ago, Barry Irwin asked to be my friend on Facebook. I sat looking at the invite for all of two seconds before clicking Confirm. Since then, we’ve posted on each other’s racing notes, seen pictures of each other’s families, and sent a few emails back and forth about this and that.

When he won the Vinery Spiral at Turfway, I was sitting on my living room couch and said “horses don’t do what he just did – not at Turfway, not at all. That’s your Derby winner.” To be fair, I’ve said that three times this prep season: The Factor, Animal Kingdom, and Archarcharch. After the race, I posted a congratulations on Barry’s wall and he responded “Thanks! We took the easy route to the Derby.”

Given how the colt had trained at Churchill in the fall before he broke his maiden, dirt was never going to be a problem. All you have to do is look at the GradeOneRacing workout reports to know that surface was merely a means to an end – this son of Leroidesanimaux just wants to run.

Earlier this week, I shared with Barry and several other owners of Derby contenders that I had filmed their workouts, jogs, and gallops over the Churchill strip. Taking me up on an offer, a 1 minute, 43 second clip was posted May 2nd on a website that only Barry (and whomever he shared it with) could see. Now that the horse has fulfilled his superstar status, I think I can share it with everyone.

It was obvious that if the colt who worked on April 30th showed up under the Spires on May 7th, the world was in for a treat. And indeed we were as the chestnut with a star and no feet took the lead mid-stretch and crossed the wire with ears pricked. Here was a horse who bucked the trends of having never raced on dirt, having won his last on a synthetic track, having six weeks between starts; and who lost his jockey much the way his jockey lost his original mount.

The irony of it all was watching Animal Kingdom walk to the Kentucky Derby winner’s circle in the infield: you have to cross the turf course to get there. I think Barry will be getting a bigger congratulations note from me this time ‘round.

What a horse. What a win.

 

P.S.: Anyone wishing to sign up for GradeOneRacing‘s yearly subscription … use promo code CHIEF CLOCKER for 20% off

Photo courtesy of KentuckyDerby.com

© 2010 Focused Filly Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha